2005 IMO Shortlist Problems/A2
Problem
(Bulgaria)
Let
denote the set of all postive real numbers. Determine all functions
such that
for all positive real numbers
and
.
Solutions
Solution 1
Lemma 1.
is non-decreasing.
Proof. Suppose, on the contrary, that there exist
such that
. We set
, so
, to obtain
,
or
, a contradiction. Template:Halmos
Lemma 2.
is not strictly increasing.
Proof. Assume the contrary. Then for all
we have
so
. Furthermore, since
is injective, we have
, which implies
, or
But then for
arbitrarily close to 0,
becomes less than 2, a contradiction. Thus
is not strictly increasing. Template:Halmos
Now, let
,
. If
is in the interval
, then
, so
so
. It follows that
,
so
, for all
in that interval.
But if
, then setting
in the original equation gives
, by induction. It follows that for any
, there exist
and
such that
, and since
is non-decreasing, we must have
for all
. It is easy to see that this satisfies the given equation. Q.E.D.
Solution 2
Lemma 1. There exist distinct positive
such that
.
Proof. Suppose the contrary, i.e., suppose
is injective. Then for any
, we have
,
which implies
![]()
.
This means that either
and
for all
(a contradiction, since that is not injective), or
, for some real
. But setting
then gives us a quadratic in
with a nonzero leading coefficient, which has at most two real roots, implying that
can only assume two different values, a contradiction. Template:Halmos
Lemma 2. There exist
and infinitely many
such that
, for all nonnegative integers
.
Proof. Let
be the distinct positive reals of Lemma 1 such that
; without loss of generality, let
. Letting
yields
Since
, this implies
. We now prove that
for all nonnegative
, by induction. We have just proven our base case. Now, assume
. Setting
gives us
,
so
, as desired. Template:Halmos
Lemma 3. For all
,
.
Proof. We note that
is the solution to the equation
, which is positive when
, so if this is the case, setting
to this value gives us
,
and since
, this implies,
, a contradiction. Template:Halmos
Lemma 4.
.
Proof. We will prove by induction that
, for all
. Our base case comes from Lemma 3. Now, if for all
,
, then for some
,
so
, as desired.
Now, suppose there exists some
. Then there exists some
such that
. But this gives us
, a contradiction. Thus for all
,
. Template:Halmos
We will now prove that
is the only solution to the functional equation. Consider any value of
. By Lemma 2, there exists some
such that
. Setting
then gives us
But from Lemma 4, we know
, so we must have
. This constant function clearly satisfies the given equation. Q.E.D.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.