2004 AIME II Problems/Problem 14
Problem
Consider a string of
's,
into which
signs are inserted to produce an arithmetic expression. For example,
could be obtained from eight
's in this way. For how many values of
is it possible to insert
signs so that the resulting expression has value
?
Solution 1
Suppose we require
s,
s, and
s to sum up to
(
). Then
, or dividing by
,
. Then the question is asking for the number of values of
.
Manipulating our equation, we have
. Thus the number of potential values of
is the number of multiples of
from
to
, or
.
However, we forgot to consider the condition that
. For a solution set
, it is possible that
(for example, suppose we counted the solution set
, but substituting into our original equation we find that
, so it is invalid). In particular, this invalidates the values of
for which their only expressions in terms of
fall into the inequality
.
For
, we can express
in terms of
and
(in other words, we take the greatest possible value of
, and then "fill in" the remainder by incrementing
). Then
, so these values work.
Similarily, for
, we can let
, and the inequality
. However, for
, we can no longer apply this approach.
So we now have to examine the numbers on an individual basis. For
,
works. For
, we find (using that respectively,
for integers
) that their is no way to satisfy the inequality
.
Thus, the answer is
.
A note: Above, we formulated the solution in a forward manner (the last four paragraphs are devoted to showing that all the solutions we found worked except for the four cases pointed out; in a contest setting, we wouldn't need to be nearly as rigorous). A more natural manner of attacking the problem is to think of the process in reverse, namely seeing that
, and noting that small values of
would not work.
Looking at the number
, we obviously see the maximum number of
: a string of
. Then, we see that the minimum is
. The next step is to see by what interval the value of
increases. Since
is
is
, we can convert a
into
and
and add
to the value of
. Since we have
to work with, this gives us
as values for
. Since
can be converted into
, we can add
to
by converting
into
. Our
, which has
. We therefore can add
to
times by doing this. All values of
not covered by this can be dealt with with the
up to
.
Solution 2
To simplify, replace all the
’s with
’s.
Because the sum is congruent to
and
Also,
. There are
positive integers that satisfy both conditions i.e.
For
, the greatest sum that is less than or equal to
is
Thus
and let
.
Note that
is possible because
.
When
, the greatest sum that is at most
is
.
All other elements of
are possible because if any element
of
between
and
is possible, then
must be too.
Sum has no
's
It must have at least one
.
If it has exactly one
, there must be nine
’s and
.
Thus, for
, the sum has more than one
, so it must have at least
number of
’s.
For
, at least one
.
To show that if
is possible, then
is possible, replace a
with
, replace eleven
’s with eleven
’s, and include nine new
’s as
’s. The sum remains
.
Sum has at least one
.
Replace an
with
, and include nine new
’s as
’s.
Now note that
is possible because
.
Thus all elements of
except
are possible.
Thus there are
possible values for
.
~phoenixfire
Solution 3
It's obvious that we cannot have any number
because
so the max number that an occur is
Let's say we have
777's ,
77's and
7's
From here we get our required equation as
Now comes the main problem , one might think that if we find number of
then we're done , but in reality we are over-counting our number of
's. This is because
is the total number of 7's and from our equation we'll get
as
(because there are three 7's , two 7's and one 7)
The reason why we're over-counting is because , say
be a solution of our original equation and
be another solution of our original equation , then there can be a possibility that
where
(example :
but
We know that
,
,
The bound on
is easier to handle with , so lets start putting values on
and calculate
by making cases
Reduced equation :
Case 1 :
We get
is our only solution thus only
value of
Case 2 :
We get
and
From here we get different
's as
(remember
and if you have difficulty in understanding how we got
then just put the values of
i am sure you will get it :) )
Let's write the sequences of
's in a compact form ,
(This will be helpful later on)
There are
values of
Case 3 :
We get
and
From here we get different
's as
Let's also write the sequences of
's in a compact form ,
Now comes the major part , since we need to find distinct
's so let's subtract the cases where we find common values , from the total number of values.
To do this we need to make
(after some calculations you'll get
) . Now we know that
and
so we get
as
and
as
so there are 9 common solutions out of 21(diff values of
) total , so there are
values of
Case 4 :
We get
and
From here we get the different
's as
Compact form of terms is
Now let's repeat the process of eliminating common solutions (one thing to notice is that we've removed common solutions of case 2 from case 3 so if we check case 4 with case 3 we'll remove common solutions from all previous cases and hence we do not have to handle common solutions of case 4 with case 2,1 and in general case X with case X-2,X-3,...2,1 , {basically means checking case X with case X-1 is enough})
and
so there are 19 common solutions out of 31 (diff values of r) so there are
values of
Now hopefully you've seen a pattern , if not try another case 5 with
you'll get
values of
Like this we get the value of "distinct"
by summing all the sub-values from the cases that we've solved.
~MrOreoJuice
Solution 4 (Construction, not counting)
First, we note that by the sun of digits and modulo 9 formula,
. Obviously,
with
is the smallest possible
. Now,
,
. The first equation applied on a representation with
1's (i.e. replacing a
, if available, with 10
's and one 1) will increase
by 18, while the second equation applied onto a representation will increase
by 9 only. Thus, there are representations of
, since for
we can just replace a
in
representation with 10
's and one 1, and for the rest we use the first equation
to "increase the range" and the second equation to "fill in the gaps" of the first equation. Essentially we use the first equation for every other multiple of nine and the second for the other multiples of nine and for once the
's run out. Next, obviously
is the maximum
one can achieve. Thus, the solutions
is all the solutions (one can check there are
) if we can show
is impossible. But it is, since
have no Diophantine solution, so we're done.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See also
| 2004 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 13 |
Followed by Problem 15 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
| All AIME Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination