1972 IMO Problems/Problem 3: Difference between revisions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
is an integer. (<math>0! = 1</math>.) | is an integer. (<math>0! = 1</math>.) | ||
== Solution == | == Solution 1 == | ||
Let <math>f(m,n)=\frac{(2m)!(2n)!}{m!n!(m+n)!}</math>. We intend to show that <math>f(m,n)</math> is integral for all <math>m,n \geq 0</math>. To start, we would like to find a recurrence relation for <math>f(m,n)</math>. | Let <math>f(m,n)=\frac{(2m)!(2n)!}{m!n!(m+n)!}</math>. We intend to show that <math>f(m,n)</math> is integral for all <math>m,n \geq 0</math>. To start, we would like to find a recurrence relation for <math>f(m,n)</math>. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Borrowed from http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asdas/imo/imo/isoln/isoln723.html | Borrowed from http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asdas/imo/imo/isoln/isoln723.html | ||
== Solution 2 == | |||
WTS: For all primes <math>p</math>, <math>V_p((2m)!)+V_p((2n)!) \ge V_p(m!)+V_p(n!)+V_p((m+n)!)</math> | |||
We know <cmath>V_p(x!)=\sum_{a=1}^{\infty} \lfloor{\frac{x}{p^a}}\rfloor</cmath> | |||
Lemma 2.1: Let <math>a,b</math> be real numbers. Then <math>\lfloor{2a}\rfloor+\lfloor{2b}\rfloor\ge\lfloor{a}\rfloor+\lfloor{b}\rfloor+\lfloor{a+b}\rfloor</math> | |||
Proof of Lemma 2.1: Let <math>a_1=\lfloor{a}\rfloor</math> and <math>b_1=\lfloor{b}\rfloor</math> | |||
<math>\lfloor{2a}\rfloor+\lfloor{2b}\rfloor=2(a_1+b_1)+\lfloor2\{a\}\rfloor+\lfloor2\{b\}\rfloor</math> | |||
On the other hand, <math>\lfloor{a}\rfloor+\lfloor{b}\rfloor+\lfloor{a+b}\rfloor=a_1+b_1+(a_1+b_1)+\lfloor\{a+b\}\rfloor</math> | |||
It is trivial that <math>\lfloor2\{a\}\rfloor+\lfloor2\{b\}\rfloor\ge\lfloor\{a+b\}\rfloor</math> | |||
Apply Lemma 2.1 to the problem: and we are pretty much done. | |||
P.S. This is my work, but perhaps someone have come up with this method before I did. | |||
Revision as of 20:29, 20 November 2018
Let
and
be arbitrary non-negative integers. Prove that
is an integer. (
.)
Solution 1
Let
. We intend to show that
is integral for all
. To start, we would like to find a recurrence relation for
.
First, let's look at
:
Second, let's look at
:
Combining,
.
Therefore, we have found the recurrence relation
.
We can see that
is integral because the RHS is just
, which we know to be integral for all
.
So,
must be integral, and then
must be integral, etc.
By induction,
is integral for all
.
Borrowed from http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asdas/imo/imo/isoln/isoln723.html
Solution 2
WTS: For all primes
,
We know
Lemma 2.1: Let
be real numbers. Then
Proof of Lemma 2.1: Let
and
On the other hand,
It is trivial that
Apply Lemma 2.1 to the problem: and we are pretty much done.
P.S. This is my work, but perhaps someone have come up with this method before I did.