Newton's Inequality: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
For <math> x_1, \ldots, x_n </math>, we define the [[symmetric sum]] <math>s_k </math> to be the coefficient of <math>t^{n-k} </math> in the polynomial <math> \prod_{i=1}^{n}(t+x_i) </math> (see [[ | For <math> x_1, \ldots, x_n </math>, we define the [[symmetric sum]] <math>s_k </math> to be the coefficient of <math>t^{n-k} </math> in the polynomial <math> \prod_{i=1}^{n}(t+x_i) </math> (see [[Viete's sums]]). We define the ''symmetric average'' <math>d_k </math> to be <math> \textstyle s_k/{n \choose k} </math>. | ||
== Statement == | == Statement == | ||
Revision as of 07:40, 22 January 2018
Background
For
, we define the symmetric sum
to be the coefficient of
in the polynomial
(see Viete's sums). We define the symmetric average
to be
.
Statement
For non-negative
and
,
,
with equality exactly when all the
are equal.
Proof
Lemma.
For real
, there exist real
with the same symmetric averages
.
Proof.
We consider the derivative of
. The roots of
are
. Without loss of generality, we assume that the
increase as
increases. Now for any
,
must have a root between
and
by Rolle's theorem if
, and if
, then
is a root of
times, so it must be a root of
times. It follows that
must have
non-positive, real roots, i.e., for some non-negative reals
,
.
It follows that the symmetric sum
for
is
, so the symmetric average
.
Thus to prove Newton's theorem, it is sufficient to prove
for any
. Since this is a homogenous inequality, we may normalize it so that
. The inequality then becomes
.
Expanding the left side, we see that this is
.
But this is clearly equivalent to
,
which holds by the rearrangement inequality.