2007 AIME I Problems/Problem 14: Difference between revisions
Tigershark22 (talk | contribs) →Solution: fix for real this time |
Add a solution to a more elementary and rigorous solution to a slightly generalized version. |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
The sequence certainly grows fast enough such that <math>\frac{2007}{a_{2005}a_{2006}}<1</math>. Therefore, the largest integer less than or equal to this value is <math>224</math>. | The sequence certainly grows fast enough such that <math>\frac{2007}{a_{2005}a_{2006}}<1</math>. Therefore, the largest integer less than or equal to this value is <math>224</math>. | ||
===Solution 3 ( generalized )=== | |||
This is a more elementary and rigorous solution to a slightly generalized version. The defining recursive sequence is generalized to | |||
<cmath> | |||
a_{n+1}a_{n-1} = a_n^2 + 9k, ---------(1) | |||
</cmath> | |||
where <math> k </math> is a positive integer and <math> a_0 = a_1 = 3. </math> | |||
Lemma 1 : For <math>n \geq 1</math>, | |||
<cmath> | |||
a_{n+1} = ( k + 2)a_n - a_{n-1}. ---------(2) | |||
</cmath> | |||
We shall prove by induction. From (1), <math> a_2 = 3k + 3 </math>. From the lemma, <math>a_2 = (k + 2) 3 - 3 = 3k + 3.</math> Base case proven. Assume that the lemma is true for some <math> t \geq 1 </math>. Then, eliminating the <math>a_{t-1}</math> using (1) and (2) gives | |||
<cmath> | |||
(k+2)a_ta_{t+1} = a_t^2 + a_{t+1}^2 + 9k. ---------(3) | |||
</cmath> | |||
It follows from (2) that | |||
<cmath> | |||
(k+2)a_{t+1} - a_t =\frac{(k+2)a_{t+1}a_t - a_t^2}{a_t} =\frac{a_{t+1}^2 + 9k}{a_t} =a_{t+2}, | |||
</cmath> | |||
where the last line followed from (1) for case <math> n = t+1 </math>. | |||
Lemma 2 : For <math>n \geq 0,</math> | |||
<cmath> | |||
a_{n+1} \geq a_{n}. | |||
</cmath> | |||
Base case is obvious. Assume that <math>a_{t+1} \geq a_{t}</math> for some <math>t \geq 0</math>. Then it follows that | |||
<cmath> | |||
a_{t+2} =\frac{a_{t+1}^2 + 9k}{a_t} = a_{t+1}(\frac{a_{t+1}}{a_t} ) + 9k \geq a_{t+1} + 9k > a_{t+1}. | |||
</cmath> | |||
This completes the induction. | |||
Lemma 3 : For <math>n \geq 1,</math> | |||
<cmath> | |||
a_n a_{n+1} > 9k | |||
</cmath> | |||
Using (1) and Lemma 2, for <math>n \geq 1,</math> | |||
<cmath> | |||
a_{n+1}a_n \geq a_{n+1}a_{n-1} = a_n^2 + 9k > 9k | |||
</cmath> | |||
Finally, using (3), for <math>n \geq 1, </math> | |||
<cmath> | |||
\frac{a_n^2 + a_{n+1}^2}{a_n a_{n+1}} =\frac{(k+2)a_n a_{n+1} - 9k}{a_n a_{n+1}} = k+2 -\frac{9k}{a_n a_{n+1}}. | |||
</cmath> | |||
Using lemma 3, the largest integer less than or equal to this value would be <math>k + 1</math>. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 10:51, 14 December 2016
Problem
A sequence is defined over non-negative integral indexes in the following way:
,
.
Find the greatest integer that does not exceed
Solution 1
We are given that
,
.
Add these two equations to get
.
This is an invariant. Defining
for each
, the above equation means
.
We can thus calculate that
. Now notice that
. This means that
. It is only a tiny bit less because all the
are greater than
, so we conclude that the floor of
is
.
Solution 2
The equation
looks like the determinant
Therefore, the determinant of this matrix is invariant. Guessing that this sequence might be a linear recursion because of the matrix form given below, we define the sequence
defined by
and
for
. We wish to find
and
such that
for all
. To do this, we use the following matrix form of a linear recurrence relation
When we take determinants, this equation becomes
We want
for all
. Therefore, we replace the two matrices by
to find that
Therefore,
. Computing that
, and using the fact that
, we conclude that
. Clearly,
,
, and
. We claim that
for all
. We proceed by induction. If
for all
, then clearly,
We also know by the definition of
that
We know that the RHS is
by previous work. Therefore,
. After substuting in the values we know, this becomes
. Thinking of this as a linear equation in the variable
, we already know that this has the solution
. Therefore, by induction,
for all
. We conclude that
satisfies the linear recurrence
.
It's easy to prove that
is a strictly increasing sequence of integers for
. Now
The sequence certainly grows fast enough such that
. Therefore, the largest integer less than or equal to this value is
.
Solution 3 ( generalized )
This is a more elementary and rigorous solution to a slightly generalized version. The defining recursive sequence is generalized to
where
is a positive integer and
Lemma 1 : For
,
We shall prove by induction. From (1),
. From the lemma,
Base case proven. Assume that the lemma is true for some
. Then, eliminating the
using (1) and (2) gives
It follows from (2) that
where the last line followed from (1) for case
.
Lemma 2 : For
Base case is obvious. Assume that
for some
. Then it follows that
This completes the induction.
Lemma 3 : For
Using (1) and Lemma 2, for
Finally, using (3), for
Using lemma 3, the largest integer less than or equal to this value would be
.
See also
| 2007 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 13 |
Followed by Problem 15 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
| All AIME Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. Error creating thumbnail: File missing