1993 USAMO Problems/Problem 3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Let's look at a function <math>g(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}0&0\le x\le \frac{1}{2};\\1&\frac{1}{2}<x\le1;\\\end{array}\right </math> | Let's look at a function <math>g(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}0&0\le x\le \frac{1}{2};\\1&\frac{1}{2}<x\le1;\\\end{array}\right\} </math> | ||
It clearly have property (i) and (ii). For <math>0\le x\le\frac{1}{2}</math> and WLOG let <math>x\le y</math>, <math>f(x)+f(y)=0+f(y)\le f(y)</math> | It clearly have property (i) and (ii). For <math>0\le x\le\frac{1}{2}</math> and WLOG let <math>x\le y</math>, <math>f(x)+f(y)=0+f(y)\le f(y)</math> | ||
Revision as of 06:55, 19 July 2016
Problem 3
Consider functions
which satisfy
| (i) | ||
| (ii) | ||
| (iii) |
Find, with proof, the smallest constant
such that
for every function
satisfying (i)-(iii) and every
in
.
Solution
My claim:
Lemma 1)
for
For
,
(ii)
Assume that it is true for
, then
By principle of induction, lemma 1 is proven.
Lemma 2) For any
,
and
,
.
(lemma 1 and (iii) )
(because
(i) )
,
. Thus,
works.
Let's look at a function
It clearly have property (i) and (ii). For
and WLOG let
,
For
,
. Thus, property (iii) holds too. Thus
is one of the legit function.
but approach to
when
is extremely close to
from the right side.
![]()
Resources
| 1993 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination