2002 AIME II Problems/Problem 7: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Thus, there are no restrictions on <math>k</math> in <math>\pmod{3}</math>. | Thus, there are no restrictions on <math>k</math> in <math>\pmod{3}</math>. | ||
It is easy to see that only one of <math>k</math>, <math>k+1</math>, and <math>2k+1</math> is divisible by <math>5</math>. So either <math>k, k+1, 2k+1 \equiv 0 \pmod{25}</math>. | |||
Thus, <math>k \equiv 0, 24, 12 \pmod{25}</math>. | Thus, <math>k \equiv 0, 24, 12 \pmod{25}</math>. | ||
Revision as of 00:34, 27 December 2014
Problem
It is known that, for all positive integers
,
Find the smallest positive integer
such that
is a multiple of
.
Solution
is a multiple of
if
is a multiple of
.
So
.
Since
is always odd, and only one of
and
is even, either
.
Thus,
.
If
, then
. If
, then
. If
, then
.
Thus, there are no restrictions on
in
.
It is easy to see that only one of
,
, and
is divisible by
. So either
.
Thus,
.
From the Chinese Remainder Theorem,
. Thus, the smallest positive integer
is
.
See also
| 2002 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 6 |
Followed by Problem 8 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
| All AIME Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. Error creating thumbnail: File missing