2001 IMO Problems/Problem 2: Difference between revisions
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Similarly <math>\frac{b}{\sqrt{b^2+8ca}} \geq \frac{b^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math> and <math>\frac{c}{\sqrt{c^2+8ab}} \geq \frac{c^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math>. | Similarly <math>\frac{b}{\sqrt{b^2+8ca}} \geq \frac{b^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math> and <math>\frac{c}{\sqrt{c^2+8ab}} \geq \frac{c^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math>. | ||
Summing the three inequalities, we obtain the original inequality. | Summing the three inequalities, we obtain the original inequality. | ||
=== Alternate Solution using Cauchy === | |||
We want to prove <cmath>\sum_{cyc}\dfrac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+8bc}}\ge 1</cmath> | |||
Note that since this inequality is homogenous, assume <math>a+b+c=3</math>. | |||
By Cauchy, <math>\left(\sum_{cyc}\dfrac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+8bc}}\right)\left(\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\right)\ge (a+b+c)^2=9</math> | |||
Dividing both sides by <math>\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}</math>, we see that we want to prove <cmath>\dfrac{9}{\sum\limits_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}}\ge 1</cmath> or equivalently <cmath>\sum\limits_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\le 9</cmath> | |||
Squaring both sides, we have <cmath>\left(\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\right)^2\le 81</cmath> | |||
Now use Cauchy again to obtain <cmath>\left(\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\right)^2\le (a+b+c)\left(\sum_{cyc}a(a^2+8bc)\right)\le 81</cmath> | |||
Since <math>a+b+c=3</math>, the inequality becomes <cmath>\sum_{cyc}a^3+8abc\le 27</cmath> after some simplifying. | |||
But this equals <cmath>(a+b+c)^3-3\left(\sum_{sym}a^2b\right)+18abc\le 27</cmath> and since <math>a+b+c=3</math> we just want to prove <cmath>\left(\sum_{sym}a^2b\right)\ge 6abc</cmath> after some simplifying. | |||
But that is true by AM-GM. Thus, proved. \(\Box\) | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 00:33, 21 May 2014
Problem
Let
be positive real numbers. Prove that
.
Solution
Solution using Holder's
By Holder's inequality,
Thus we need only show that
Which is obviously true since
.
Alternate Solution using Jensen's
This inequality is homogeneous so we can assume without loss of generality
and apply Jensen's inequality for
, so we get:
but
by AMGM, and thus the inequality is proven.
Alternate Solution using Isolated Fudging
We claim that
Cross-multiplying, squaring both sides and expanding, we have
After cancelling the
term, we apply AM-GM to RHS and obtain
as desired, completing the proof of the claim.
Similarly
and
.
Summing the three inequalities, we obtain the original inequality.
Alternate Solution using Cauchy
We want to prove
Note that since this inequality is homogenous, assume
.
By Cauchy,
Dividing both sides by
, we see that we want to prove
or equivalently
Squaring both sides, we have
Now use Cauchy again to obtain
Since
, the inequality becomes
after some simplifying.
But this equals
and since
we just want to prove
after some simplifying.
But that is true by AM-GM. Thus, proved. \(\Box\)
See also
| 2001 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
| Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
| All IMO Problems and Solutions | ||