Fallacious proof/2equals1: Difference between revisions
I read this "proof" in a magazine a long time ago |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=== Explanation === | === Explanation === | ||
The | The given series does not converge. Therefore, manipulations such as grouping terms before adding are invalid. | ||
[[ | |||
''[[Fallacious_proof#2_.3D_1 | Back to main article]]'' | |||
Revision as of 14:04, 21 July 2009
The following proofs are examples of fallacious proofs, namely that
.
Proof 1
Let
.
Then we have
(since
)
(adding
to both sides)
(factoring out a 2 on the LHS)
(dividing by
)
Explanation
The trick in this argument is when we divide by
. Since
,
, and dividing by zero is illegal.
Proof 2
Explanation
The given series does not converge. Therefore, manipulations such as grouping terms before adding are invalid.