2008 IMO Problems/Problem 3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<cmath>|d| \le \frac{b-1}{2}.</cmath> | <cmath>|d| \le \frac{b-1}{2}.</cmath> | ||
< | <cmath>n^2+1 = (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2) \le p\left( \frac{(a-1)^2}{4}+\frac{(b-1)^2}{4} \right).\label{(2)}</cmath> | ||
Before we proceed, we would like to show that <math>a+b-1 > \sqrt{p}</math>. Observe that the function <math>x+\sqrt{p-x^2}</math> over <math>x\in(2,\sqrt{p-4})</math> reaches its minima on the ends, so <math>a+b</math> given <math>a^2+b^2=p</math> is minimized for <math>a = 2</math>, where it equals <math>2+\sqrt{p-2^2}</math>. So we want to show that <cmath>2+\sqrt{p-4} > \sqrt{p} + 1,</cmath> | Before we proceed, we would like to show that <math>a+b-1 > \sqrt{p}</math>. Observe that the function <math>x+\sqrt{p-x^2}</math> over <math>x\in(2,\sqrt{p-4})</math> reaches its minima on the ends, so <math>a+b</math> given <math>a^2+b^2=p</math> is minimized for <math>a = 2</math>, where it equals <math>2+\sqrt{p-2^2}</math>. So we want to show that <cmath>2+\sqrt{p-4} > \sqrt{p} + 1,</cmath> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Finally, | Finally, | ||
<cmath>u^2(u-1)^2 > 4n^2+4 > 4n^2\ | <cmath>u^2(u-1)^2 > 4n^2+4 > 4n^2\Rightarrow \\ | ||
u(u-1) > 2n \ | u(u-1) > 2n \Rightarrow u > \sqrt{2n} + \frac{1}{2} \Rightarrow \\ | ||
p = u^2 > 2n + \sqrt{2n}.</cmath> | p = u^2 > 2n + \sqrt{2n}.</cmath> | ||
Revision as of 23:07, 3 September 2008
(still editing...)
The main idea is to take a gaussian prime
and multiply it by a "twice as small"
to get
. The rest is just making up the little details.
For each {\em sufficiently large} prime
of the form
, we shall find a corresponding
satisfying the required condition with the prime number in question being
. Since there exist infinitely many such primes and, for each of them,
, we will have found infinitely many distinct
satisfying the problem.
Take a prime
of the form
and consider its "sum-of-two squares" representation
, which we know to exist for all such primes. As
, assume without loss of generality that
. If
, then
is our guy, and
as long as
(and hence
) is large enough. Let's see what happens when
.
Since
and
are (obviously) co-prime, there must exist integers
and
such that
In fact, if
and
are such numbers, then
and
work as well for any integer
, so we can assume that
.
Define
and let's see what happens. Notice that
.
If
, then from (1), we see that
must divide
and hence
. In turn,
and
. Therefore,
and so
, from where
. Finally,
and the case
is cleared.
We can safely assume now that
As
implies
, we have
so
Before we proceed, we would like to show that
. Observe that the function
over
reaches its minima on the ends, so
given
is minimized for
, where it equals
. So we want to show that
which obviously holds for large
.
Now armed with
and (2), we get
where
Finally,