2001 IMO Shortlist Problems/A3: Difference between revisions
Maths1234rc (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Hence Proved by Maths1234RC | Hence Proved by Maths1234RC | ||
P.S. This is my first solution on AOPS.<math>\blacksquare</math> | P.S. This is my first solution on AOPS.<math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
== Solution 3 == | |||
Let <math>S_n = 1 + x^2 + \cdots + x_n^2</math> where <math>S_0 = 1</math> by convention. | |||
Rewriting the inequality, | |||
<cmath> | |||
\frac{x_1}{S_1} + \frac{x_2}{S_2} + \cdots + \frac{x_n}{S_n} < \sqrt{n} | |||
</cmath> | |||
must be proven. | |||
Note that by Chebyshev's inequality, the following could be driven. | |||
<cmath> | |||
\left( \sum_{i = 1}^n \frac{x_i}{S_i} \right)^2 \leq n \left( \sum_{i = 1}^n \frac{x_i^2}{S_i^2} \right) | |||
</cmath> | |||
Therefore, it suffices to prove that <math>\sum_{i = 1}^n \frac{x_i^2}{S_i^2} < 1</math>. Notice that <math>x_i^2 = S_i - S_{i - 1}</math>. | |||
<math>Lemma.</math> | |||
<cmath> | |||
\sum_{i = 1}^n \frac{S_i - S_{i - 1}}{S_i^2} < 1 | |||
</cmath> | |||
is true. | |||
<math>Proof.</math> | |||
Because <math>S_n</math> is a monotonically increasing sequence, <math>S_i^2 \geq S_i \cdot S_{i - 1}</math>. | |||
<cmath> | |||
\sum_{i = 1}^n \frac{S_i - S_{i - 1}}{S_i^2} | |||
\leq \sum_{i = 1}^n \frac{S_i - S_{i - 1}}{S_i \cdot S_{i - 1}} | |||
= \sum_{i = 1}^n \left( \frac{1}{S_{i - 1}} - \frac{1}{S_i} \right) | |||
= \frac{1}{S_0} - \frac{1}{S_n} | |||
= 1 - \frac{1}{S_n} < 1 | |||
</cmath> | |||
<math>\blacksquare</math> | |||
Hence, the inequality is true. | |||
~MaPhyCom (Thinking Tree) | |||
I also have a video explanation of this solution!! | |||
[https://youtu.be/mjUccETe65w Please consider subscribing :))] | |||
Latest revision as of 03:12, 25 September 2025
Problem
Let
be arbitrary real numbers. Prove the inequality
Solution 1
We prove the following general inequality, for arbitrary positive real
:
with equality only when
.
We proceed by induction on
. For
, we have trivial equality. Now, suppose our inequality holds for
. Then by inductive hypothesis,
If we let
, then we have
with equality only if
.
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality,
with equality only when
. Since
, our equality cases never coincide, so we have the desired strict inequality for
. Thus our inequality is true by induction. The problem statement therefore follows from setting
.
Solution 2
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
For all real numbers.
Hence it is only required to prove
where
for
,
For k=1,
Summing these inequalities, the right-hand side yields
Hence Proved by Maths1234RC
P.S. This is my first solution on AOPS.
Solution 3
Let
where
by convention.
Rewriting the inequality,
must be proven.
Note that by Chebyshev's inequality, the following could be driven.
Therefore, it suffices to prove that
. Notice that
.
![]()
is true.
Because
is a monotonically increasing sequence,
.
Hence, the inequality is true.
~MaPhyCom (Thinking Tree)
I also have a video explanation of this solution!! Please consider subscribing :))
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.