2002 OIM Problems/Problem 3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Pablo was copying the following problem: | Pablo was copying the following problem: | ||
<cmath>\textit{Consider all sequences of 2004 real numbers}(x_0,x_1,x_2,\cdots , x_{2003})\textit{, such that}</cmath> | |||
<cmath>x_0=1\text{,}</cmath> | <cmath>x_0=1\text{,}</cmath> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<cmath>0\le x_{2003} \le 2x_{2004} \text{.}</cmath> | <cmath>0\le x_{2003} \le 2x_{2004} \text{.}</cmath> | ||
<cmath>\ | <cmath>\textit{Among all these sequences, find the one for which the following expression takes its largest value:}</cmath> | ||
<cmath>S = ...</cmath> | <cmath>S = ...</cmath> | ||
When Pablo was going to copy the expression for <math>S</math>, they erased the blackboard. The only thing he could remember was that <math>S</math> was of the form | When Pablo was going to copy the expression for <math>S</math>, they erased the blackboard. The only thing he could remember was that <math>S</math> was of the form | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 13 December 2023
Problem
Pablo was copying the following problem:
When Pablo was going to copy the expression for
, they erased the blackboard. The only thing he could remember was that
was of the form
where the last term,
, had a coefficient +1, and the previous ones had a coefficient +1 or -1. Show that Paul, despite not having the complete statement, can find with certainty the solution to the problem.
~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com
Solution
This problem needs a solution. If you have a solution for it, please help us out by adding it.