2013 IMO Problems/Problem 1: Difference between revisions
Skywalker94 (talk | contribs) m →Solution: Fixed inconsistent formatting. |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Therefore, since <math>n</math> was arbitrary, the claim is true for <math>k = m+1</math>, for all <math>n</math>. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers <math>n</math>, <math>k</math>. | Therefore, since <math>n</math> was arbitrary, the claim is true for <math>k = m+1</math>, for all <math>n</math>. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers <math>n</math>, <math>k</math>. | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
*[[2013 IMO]] | *[[2013 IMO]] | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 11 July 2023
Problem
Prove that for any pair of positive integers
and
, there exist
positive integers
(not necessarily different) such that
.
Solution
We prove the claim by induction on
.
Base case: If
then
, so the claim is true for all positive integers
.
Inductive hypothesis: Suppose that for some
the claim is true for
, for all
.
Inductive step: Let
be arbitrary and fixed. Case on the parity of
:
[Case 1:
is even]
[Case 2:
is odd]
In either case,
for some
.
By the induction hypothesis we can choose
such that
.
Therefore, since
was arbitrary, the claim is true for
, for all
. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers
,
.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.