2016 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 5: Difference between revisions
Hashtagmath (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<math>\textbf{(A) }0\qquad\textbf{(B) }2\qquad\textbf{(C) }4\qquad\textbf{(D) }5\qquad \textbf{(E) }7</math> | <math>\textbf{(A) }0\qquad\textbf{(B) }2\qquad\textbf{(C) }4\qquad\textbf{(D) }5\qquad \textbf{(E) }7</math> | ||
===Solution 1=== | ===Solution 1=== | ||
| Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
To prove generalization vigorously, we can let <math>a</math> be the remainder when <math>z</math> is divided by <math>11.</math> Setting up a modular equation, we have <cmath>90c + 73 \equiv a \pmod {11}.</cmath> Simplifying, <cmath>90c+7 \equiv a \pmod {11}</cmath> If <math>c = 1,</math> then we don't have a 2 digit number! Thus, <math>c=0</math> and <math>a=\boxed { \textbf{(E) }7}</math> | To prove generalization vigorously, we can let <math>a</math> be the remainder when <math>z</math> is divided by <math>11.</math> Setting up a modular equation, we have <cmath>90c + 73 \equiv a \pmod {11}.</cmath> Simplifying, <cmath>90c+7 \equiv a \pmod {11}</cmath> If <math>c = 1,</math> then we don't have a 2 digit number! Thus, <math>c=0</math> and <math>a=\boxed { \textbf{(E) }7}</math> | ||
==Solution 3== | |||
==Video Solution== | ==Video Solution== | ||
Revision as of 17:19, 1 April 2021
Problem
The number
is a two-digit number.
• When
is divided by
, the remainder is
.
• When
is divided by
, the remainder is
.
What is the remainder when
is divided by
?
Solution 1
From the second bullet point, we know that the second digit must be
. Because there is a remainder of
when it is divided by
, the multiple of
must end in a
in order for it to have the desired remainder
We now look for this one:
The number
satisfies both conditions. We subtract the biggest multiple of
less than
to get the remainder. Thus,
.
Solution 2 ~ More efficient for proofs
This two digit number must take the form of
where
and
are integers
to
However, if x is an integer, we must have
So, the number's new form is
This needs to have a remainder of
when divided by
Because of the
divisibility rule, we have
We subtract the three, getting
which simplifies to
However,
so
and
Let the quotient of
in our modular equation be
and let our desired number be
so
and
We substitute these values into
and get
so
As a result,
- Alternatively, we could have also used a system of modular equations to immediately receive

To prove generalization vigorously, we can let
be the remainder when
is divided by
Setting up a modular equation, we have
Simplifying,
If
then we don't have a 2 digit number! Thus,
and
Solution 3
Video Solution
https://youtu.be/7an5wU9Q5hk?t=574
| 2016 AMC 8 (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
| All AJHSME/AMC 8 Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination