Fallacious proof/2equals1: Difference between revisions
IntrepidMath (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== | The following proofs are examples of [[fallacious proof]]s, namely that <math>2 = 1</math>. | ||
== Proof 1 == | |||
Let <math>a=b</math>. | Let <math>a=b</math>. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
=== Explanation === | === Explanation === | ||
The trick in this argument is when we divide by <math>a^{2}-ab</math>. Since a=b, <math>a^2-ab</math> | The trick in this argument is when we divide by <math>a^{2}-ab</math>. Since <math>a=b</math>, <math>a^2-ab = 0</math>, and dividing by [[0|zero]] is undefined. | ||
== Proof 2 == | |||
<cmath>1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 \ldots = 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 \ldots</cmath> | |||
<cmath>(1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) \ldots = 1 + (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) \ldots</cmath> | |||
<cmath>2 + 0 + 0 \ldots = 1 + 0 + 0 \ldots</cmath> | |||
<cmath>2 = 1</cmath> | |||
=== Explanation === | |||
The given series does not converge. Therefore, manipulations such as grouping terms before adding are invalid. | |||
''[[Fallacy#2_.3D_1 | Back to main article]]'' | |||
Latest revision as of 13:04, 16 May 2025
The following proofs are examples of fallacious proofs, namely that
.
Proof 1
Let
.
Then we have
(since
)
(adding
to both sides)
(factoring out a 2 on the LHS)
(dividing by
)
Explanation
The trick in this argument is when we divide by
. Since
,
, and dividing by zero is undefined.
Proof 2
Explanation
The given series does not converge. Therefore, manipulations such as grouping terms before adding are invalid.