1980 USAMO Problems/Problem 2: Difference between revisions
Cooljoseph (talk | contribs) Added Solution 2 |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
If <math>n</math> is odd, the <math>n</math>th number will give <cmath>\frac{n-1}{2}</cmath> more triplets. | If <math>n</math> is odd, the <math>n</math>th number will give <cmath>\frac{n-1}{2}</cmath> more triplets. | ||
Let <math>f(n)</math> denote the total number of triplets for <math>n</math> numbers. The above two statements are summarized as follows: | Let <math>f(n)</math> denote the total number of triplets for <math>n</math> numbers. The above two statements are summarized as follows: | ||
If <math>n</math> is even, <cmath>f(n) = f(n-1) + \frac{n} | If <math>n</math> is even, <cmath>f(n) = f(n-1) + \frac{n}2 - 1</cmath> | ||
If <math>n</math> is odd, <cmath>f(n) = f(n-1) + \frac{n-1} | If <math>n</math> is odd, <cmath>f(n) = f(n-1) + \frac{n-1}2</cmath> | ||
Let's obtain the closed form for when <math>n</math> is even: | Let's obtain the closed form for when <math>n</math> is even: | ||
<cmath>f(n) = f(n-2) + n-2 | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
f(n) &= f(n-2) + n-2\\ | |||
f(n) &= f(n-4) + (n-2) + (n-4)\\ | |||
f(n) &= \sum_{i=1}^{n/2} n - 2i\\ | |||
\Aboxed{f(n\ \text{even}) &= \frac{n^2 - 2n}4} | |||
\end{align*}</cmath> | |||
Now obtain the closed form when <math>n</math> is odd by using the previous result for when <math>n</math> is even | Now obtain the closed form when <math>n</math> is odd by using the previous result for when <math>n</math> is even: | ||
<cmath>f(n) = f(n-1) + \frac{n-1} | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
f(n) &= f(n-1) + \frac{n-1}2\\ | |||
\ | f(n) &= \frac{{(n-1)}^2 - 2(n-1)}4 + \frac{n-1}2\\ | ||
\Aboxed{f(n\ \text{odd}) &= \frac{{(n-1)}^2}4} | |||
\end{align*}</cmath> | |||
Note the ambiguous wording in the question! If the "arithmetic progression" is allowed to be a disordered subsequence, then every progression counts twice, both as an ascending progression and as a descending progression. | Note the ambiguous wording in the question! If the "arithmetic progression" is allowed to be a disordered subsequence, then every progression counts twice, both as an ascending progression and as a descending progression. | ||
Double the expression to account for the descending versions of each triple, to obtain: | Double the expression to account for the descending versions of each triple, to obtain: | ||
< | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
f(n\ \text{even}) &= \frac{n^2 - 2n}2\\ | |||
f(n\ \text{odd}) &= \frac{{(n-1)}^2}2\\ | |||
\Aboxed{f(n) &= \biggl\lfloor\frac{(n-1)^2}2\biggr\rfloor} | |||
\end{align*}</cmath> | |||
~Lopkiloinm | ~Lopkiloinm (corrected by integralarefun) | ||
== Solution 2 == | |||
Unlike in the previous solution, I am interpreting "arithmetic progressions" to be in the same direction as the monotone sequence of real numbers. So, for example, if the sequence of reals is <math>1 < 4 < 5 < 6</math>, then <math>(4, 5, 6)</math> counts but <math>(6, 5, 4)</math> doesn't. | |||
The first solution proves that there is a sequence with <math>\lfloor (n - 1)^2 / 4 \rfloor</math> such arithmetic progressions. In this solution, I prove that this is in fact the upper bound. | |||
Count the arithmetic progressions by their center values. Let <math>x_k</math> be the <math>k</math>th greatest number. The number <math>x_k</math> is the center of at most <math>\min(k - 1, n - k)</math> arithmetic progressions, because any such progression includes a number less than <math>x_k</math> and a number greater than <math>x_k</math>. There are <math>k - 1</math> numbers less than <math>x_k</math> and <math>n - k</math> numbers greater than <math>x_k</math>, and none of these can be in two separate arithmetic progressions with the same middle term <math>x_k</math>. | |||
Thus, the total number of arithmetic progressions is at most | |||
<cmath>\sum_{k = 1}^n \min(k - 1, n - k).</cmath> | |||
This equals | |||
<cmath>1 + 2 + \cdots + \frac{n - 3}{2} + \frac{n - 1}{2} + \frac{n - 3}{2} + \cdots + 2 + 1 = \frac{(n - 1)^2}{4}</cmath> | |||
if <math>n</math> is odd, and | |||
<cmath>1 + 2 + \cdots + \frac{n-2}{2} + \frac n2 + \frac n2 + \frac{n-2}{2} + \cdots + 2 + 1 = \frac{(n - 1)^2 - 1}{4}</cmath> | |||
if <math>n</math> is even. This can be summarized as | |||
<cmath>\left\lfloor \frac{(n - 1)^2}{4} \right\rfloor.</cmath> | |||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
Latest revision as of 02:39, 18 October 2025
Problem
Find the maximum possible number of three term arithmetic progressions in a monotone sequence of
distinct reals.
Solution
Consider the first few cases for
with the entire
numbers forming an arithmetic sequence
If
, there will be one ascending triplet (123). Let's only consider the ascending order for now.
If
, the first 3 numbers give 1 triplet, the addition of the 4 gives one more, for 2 in total.
If
, the first 4 numbers give 2 triplets, and the 5th number gives 2 more triplets (135 and 345).
Repeating a few more times, we can quickly see that if
is even, the nth number will give
more triplets in addition to all the prior triplets from the first
numbers.
If
is odd, the
th number will give
more triplets.
Let
denote the total number of triplets for
numbers. The above two statements are summarized as follows:
If
is even,
If
is odd,
Let's obtain the closed form for when
is even:
Now obtain the closed form when
is odd by using the previous result for when
is even:
Note the ambiguous wording in the question! If the "arithmetic progression" is allowed to be a disordered subsequence, then every progression counts twice, both as an ascending progression and as a descending progression.
Double the expression to account for the descending versions of each triple, to obtain:
~Lopkiloinm (corrected by integralarefun)
Solution 2
Unlike in the previous solution, I am interpreting "arithmetic progressions" to be in the same direction as the monotone sequence of real numbers. So, for example, if the sequence of reals is
, then
counts but
doesn't.
The first solution proves that there is a sequence with
such arithmetic progressions. In this solution, I prove that this is in fact the upper bound.
Count the arithmetic progressions by their center values. Let
be the
th greatest number. The number
is the center of at most
arithmetic progressions, because any such progression includes a number less than
and a number greater than
. There are
numbers less than
and
numbers greater than
, and none of these can be in two separate arithmetic progressions with the same middle term
.
Thus, the total number of arithmetic progressions is at most
This equals
if
is odd, and
if
is even. This can be summarized as
See Also
| 1980 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. Error creating thumbnail: File missing