1999 USAMO Problems/Problem 3: Difference between revisions
→Solution: ; formatting, kerning, and another remark |
Mathophobia (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
(This solution makes absolutely no sense. Why is <math>k^4\equiv 1</math>? And how do we know that only <math>3</math> and <math>5</math> work!?) | (This solution makes absolutely no sense. Why is <math>k^4\equiv 1</math>? And how do we know that only <math>3</math> and <math>5</math> work!?) | ||
why can't you have a,b,c,d = 2,2,2,4 p = 5 r=1? it doesn't say distinct integers | |||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
Latest revision as of 00:18, 11 November 2024
Problem
Let
be a prime and let
be integers not divisible by
, such that
for any integer
not divisible by
. Prove that at least two of the numbers
,
,
,
,
,
are divisible by
.
(Note:
denotes the fractional part of
.)
Solution
We see that
means that
. Now, since
does not divide
and
is prime, their GCD is 1 so
.
Since
, then we see that they have to represent mods
, and thus, our possible values of
are all such that
for all
that are relatively prime to
. This happens when
or
.
When
then
is not divisible by 3, thus two are
, and the other two are
. Thus, four pairwise sums sum to 3.
When
then
is not divisible by 5 so
are
and
, so two pairwise sums sum to 5.
All three possible cases work so we are done.
(This solution makes absolutely no sense. Why is
? And how do we know that only
and
work!?)
why can't you have a,b,c,d = 2,2,2,4 p = 5 r=1? it doesn't say distinct integers
See Also
| 1999 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. Error creating thumbnail: File missing